What shoppers say - about GDAs
Kim Malcolm, Account Director, Millward Brown
It has been suggested that some people in everyday life struggle
with percentages, take longer to read them than is practical and
consequently will not use them on GDA labels on the front of food
packs.
These arguments appear unfounded based on the findings of
four surveys conducted over the last two years.
Here are typical things shoppers said when asked why they use GDA labels:
-
A friend is diabetic and I had to check for sugar levels”
Female, 18–29, HTV West/Wales
-
When choosing a product I use them to
make quick comparisons
between different
products. I use them
to avoid products that
are excessively high in
salt, fat or calories.”
Female, 30–44, Central
-
“I use them to see
amount of calories,
sugar and saturated
fat contained in
an item”
Female, 45–64, HTV West/Wales
-
"My husband has high
blood pressure so he
needs to control salt
and calorie intake.”
Female, 45–64, Border/Tyne Tees
-
“These labels could
be used to help people
maintain a balanced
diet. To keep them up
to check with how
much salt or sugars
they have been
consuming.”
Male, 18–29, London
-
“To see how much fat
is in food, and how
much salt.”
Male, 18–29, Border/Tyne Tees
-
“To decide the
amount of calories
of my total daily
intake and to see the
fat and salt content
of the serving.”
Male, 30–44, London
-
“To work out whether to
buy the product or not.
If the amount of salt or
calories in a product is
too high then I don't buy
it. If I do buy the product
then I know what else I
can eat in a day.”
Male, 30–44, London
-
“I used the guidelines when I was on a diet.”
Female, 30–44, Scotland
-
“As a guide to the
amount of calories
consumed.”
Male, 45–64, London
-
“To check how much
salt or sugar the
product contains.”
Female, 30–44, Central
-
“To check amount of
saturated fats and
sugars.”
Female, 30–44, London
-
“As a guide to my
daily intake – it would
also be helpful in
planning your daily
intake of specific fat
and calories.”
Male, 65–75, Central
More information
Last reviewed: 27 Apr 2009